Comptroller
Auditor General Report 19 of 2018
-
R.Pattabiraman
I happened to go thro the report of CAG regarding Contract Labours in
Railways and Compliance to Statuary Requirements. Unfortunately no such report for BSNL was
found and it is not known also whether CAG intended to have one such audit in
BSNL about the system of contract and its compliance of statuary provisions
spelt in various acts. The HOC of BSNL in their meeting recorded that one lakh
contract Labours are presently working in BSNL. If
such a big size means, the issue
is very serious regarding the compliance of statuary requirements like Minimum
Pages and Paying the same in the prescribed period- Taking responsibility for
EPF and ESI- Keeping registers speaking
details of Contractors and labours- wage register etc.
I have given here some relevant observations from the report of CAG (of
course w.r.t Railways) which may be useful to those working for the welfare of
labours. These are all CAG Paras and so have some importance.
It seems that Railways do not have any such Contract Labour Payment
Management Portal a kind of in-house developed application initiated by
Minister Piyush Goyal for CIL. NLC is also following this type of portal management system.
It is a comprehensive database of all contract workers engaged by different
contractors and the system has in-built mechanism to validate minimum wages
paid, generate wage slips and employment card etc. of contract workers as
required under the Act. The portal provides access to all contract workers,
through a Workers Identification Number (WIN), to view their personal details
and payment status. Contract workers can also register their grievance through
this portal.
CAG observed that Railways not used the opportunity utilizing the
Unified Shram Suvidha Portal of Ministry of Labour to improve compliance of
labour laws. It is difficult to
understand whether BSNL management from top to bottom has any awareness about
these all.
Paras From CAG Report
1.1.1 What constitutes 'contract labour'
Contract labour is a term which is applied to manpower engaged by
somebody else to produce a given result to the Principal Employer, where this
manpower has no direct relationship of employer-employee with the Principal
Employer. This includes supply of manpower to Principal Employer by a
contractor, where the contractor is not involved in the specified activity.
Thus, contract labour system is not restricted to outsourcing only. 'Contract
labour' reflects manpower whereas 'outsourcing' reflects the job or the
activity.
When the jobs and services are outsourced and are carried out in some
other premises not being premises under control and management of the Principal
Employer, CLRA, 1970 will not apply. All other outsourced jobs and services,
which are carried out in the premises of the Principal Employer will be covered
under CLRA, 1970
2.4.5 In case the contractor fails to make payment of wages within the
prescribed period or makes short payment, then the Principal Employer shall be
liable to make payment of wages in full or the unpaid balance due, as the case
may be, to the contract labour employed by the contractor and recover the
amount so paid from the contractor either by deduction from any amount payable
to the contractor under any contract or as a debt payable by the contractor.
2.5 Maintenance and preservation of prescribed registers and records
a) Maintenance of records by the Principal Employers In respect of each
registered establishment, Principal Employers are required to maintain a
‘Register of Contractors’ in Form XII (Appendix VI) showing name and address of
the Principal Employer, name and address of the establishment, name and address
of contractor, nature of work on contract, location of contract work, period of
contract and maximum number of contract labour employed by contractor
b) Maintenance of records by the contractors Every contractor is also
required to maintain a number of important records. This includes Muster Roll,
Register of Wages, Register of Deductions, Register of Overtime, Register of
Fines, Register of Advances, Wages Slips34 etc.
3.1.1Responsibility of the Principal Employer to ensure registration of
the contractor before award of contract
As per the directives of Employee’s Provident Fund Organization , before awarding any contract, the Principal
Employer shall ensure that the contractor is registered with EPFO. After award
of the contract the contractor details should also be entered by the Principal
Employer in the EPFO portal.
3.1.3 Allotment of Provident Fund Account Number to Contract Labour Rules50
require that the employer (contractor) shall send to the organisation of EPF
Commissioner within 15 days of the close of each month, a return in Form 5 of
the employees qualifying to become a member of the fund for the first time
during the preceding month together with the declaration in Form 2 furnished by
such qualifying employees’. The Commissioner shall promptly allot a PF Account
Number to each employee qualifying to become a member and shall communicate
the Account Number to the member through the employer 3.1.4 Responsibility of
the Principal Employer towards payment of EPF deduction from the wages of
contract labour and contribution by the contractors
Principal Employer is responsible to pay both the contribution payable
by himself in respect of the employees directly employed by him and also in
respect of the employees employed by or through a contractor and also
administrative charges. In respect of employees employed by or through a
contractor, the contractor shall recover the contribution payable by such
employee (member’s contribution) and shall pay to the Principal Employer the
amount of member’s contribution so deducted together with an equal amount of
contribution (in employer’s contribution) and also administrative charges
About irregularity in Railways: CAG’s Observations (sampling 463 contracts)
In all 463 contracts, notices regarding payment of wages were not sent
by the contractors to the Principal Employers/nominee of the Principal
Employer. No directions had been issued by Railways to the Principal Employers
or their nominees for ensuring payments to contract labour and recovering the
same from the contractors in case of non-payment/short payment. Railway Administration
had not nominated any authorised representative to be present at the time of disbursement of wages
in all 463 contracts. Despite Railway Board’s instructions to ensure payment of
wages to the contract labours through Bank/ Cheque, the same was ensured only
in respect of 82 contracts. In 212 contracts, information regarding means of
payment was not made available to Audit
Minimum wages were paid in compliance to the provision of MWA, 1948 in respect
of 105 contracts only. Payment of minimum wages to contract labour was not
ensured in respect of 129 contracts. Audit assessed a sum of ` 9.23 crore as
short payment to 3310 contract labour over the contract period towards payment
of minimum wages. Records were not made available in respect of 229 contracts.
Railway Administration had verified the registration of contractor with
the EPFO before award of the contracts only in 20 contracts. In 431 contracts, records
were not made available.
Para 3.1.1 Only in 46
contracts, PF Registration was found to be taken by the contractors.
In 321 contracts, information was not found on record. Para 3.1.2 In
only 61 contracts, PF Account Numbers of contract labour were available.
In 258 contracts, relevant records were not made available to Audit In
116 contracts, contractors were not registered with concerned Regional offices
of ESIC, and had not been allotted Employer’s code numbers. Records were not
made available for 235 contracts
14-6-19
Comments
Post a Comment