Revival
and restructuring of BSNL
( Govt has issued specific
guidelines for Revival /Restructuring /closure of PSus. The Guidelines may
expect certain sacrifices from the stake holders . Govt cannot avoid its own
guidelines in the name of objection of one of its prime limbs viz MOF (if at
all anything so). MOF / DOE may have rights to question about the DOT’s
Proposals and may direct to follow PIB/ EFC Mechanism (Public Investment Board/
Expenditure Finance Committee). It is a specified task given to the concerned
Ministry to act as per the Govt Guidelines to decide the process of Revival/
Restructuring of the given PSU. The process may be delayed but cannot be kept
in cold storage for long. Infusion of equity is found normally as the mechanism
for revival. In the case of ITI Ltd financial assistance were also given as aid. But the process was very long drawn. In the case
of Air India it took 10 years to get the announced equity infusion.
In the case of BSNL/MTNL, if any road map is already
drawn, it is better to segregate the plans by not treating both the PSUs in
similar footing. Each Psu may need a
specific mechanism as per its required strategic, business and financial
positions.
Our Business area is pan india . We came with Govt retirement Rules
FR 56 a ( 60 years) to BSNL - but MTNL
got it vide DPE orders where powers are there for the
cabinet to reduce to 58 years. MTNL is a disinvested company. MTNL
already experienced VRS, in our case no such experience. MTNL Net worth is
negative, but BSNL is still having positive net worth and we are incipient sick
only. MTNL’s debt servicing finance consumes 63 % of rev. MTNL has already
floated bonds with Govt Guarantee. As on
date, Merger plan is not contemplated and so different road map is better as
done for different PSUs.)
(RP 17-9-19)
“Guidelines for “Streamlining the
mechanism for revival and restructuring of sick/ incipient sick and weak
Central Public Sector Enterprises: General principles and mechanism of
restructuring”
Some Salient Points
3. Primary responsibility for
supervision of a CPSE for its efficient functioning lies in the administrative
ministry and final view for restructuring and revival of sick and incipient
sick CPSEs or taking appropriate measures for CPSEs showing early indications
of weakness has to be taken by them with approval of the competent authority
after inter - ministerial consultation and concurrence of the Ministry of Finance
through PIB/ EFC mechanism as may be required. It is in the public interest to
make this process, time bound, comprehensive, performance driven and efficient so
that such decisions are taken and implemented in a time bound manner to minimise
further losses
4.2.2 Incipient sick CPSEs:
A CPSE would be considered incipient sick if it meets one of the following
criteria:
a. If its net worth is less than
50% of its paid-up capital in any financial year.
b. If it had incurred losses
consecutively for three years
4.4 The administrative
ministry will take the following action:
(b) The administrative ministry
shall initiate the process for preparation of restructuring/ revival plan,
which may include disinvestment or privatisation or closure options, for sick/
incipient sick CPSEs based on the classification as given above within 6 months
from the closure of the financial year or within one month from finalisation of
Annual Accounts, whichever is earlier.
(c) Restructuring and revival
plan for the sick and incipient sick CPSEs shall be prepared within nine months
of the closure of the financial year.
(d) External expert agency which
has experience and expertise of the business environment, operational issues,
technology option and financial viability of the sector in which such CPSE is
functioning may be engaged by the government and shall function under the
supervision of the administrative ministry for preparation of the future road
map.
4.5.1 Perspective of Relevance
and Functioning:
a) Background and purpose of the
formation of the CPSE.
b) Economic and regulatory
environment along with their impact on the growth of the company
c) Liberalisation and its impact
on its business operation
d) Ability of the CPSE in
adapting new business strategies, technology to regain and sustain its economic
viability.
e) Efforts and special
interventions made for its revival or avert early sickness and its impact on
the health of the CPSE
4.5.2 Strategic Plan for
Restructuring/Revival:
(a) The concerned administrative
ministry/department should clearly bring out the national and strategic
interest served by the CPSEs in the light of the sectoral business environment,
domestic as well as global.
4.5.3 Business Plan for
Restructuring/ Revival Plan:
A. High Priority or Priority
CPSE.
a) For high priority CPSEs, the
business plan has to be made keeping in mind the strategic national interest
and economically viable business opportunities.
b) For strategic business model,
requirement for Government policy convergence should be clearly spelt out to
meet the economic viability of such enterprises
4.5.4 Operational
Restructuring:
a) Keeping in mind the business
plan, the required human resource needs are to be assessed and rationalised.
c) Options for adopting requisite
technology and up-gradation of the same as per requirement through various
management options including JV, disinvestment or privatisation to be factored
into the operational restructuring plan.
d) The options of merger or
de-merger of various operations in line with the proposed business plan to
ensure continuous procurement of new technology and its up-gradation
4.5.5 Financial Restructuring
Plan:
a) For high priority and priority
CPSEs, a comprehensive financial restructuring plan should be drawn comprising
various methods of financing with minimum and unavoidable viability gap funding
in the strategic national/defence interest.
Limited private investment
through disinvestment within permissible limits may also be considered under
financial plan.
4.6 Mechanism and Methodology
to be followed for restructuring/revival/closing of sick CPSEs
(d) Implementation plan with
specified time line for various stages should be objective, quantifiable and
supported with the monitoring mechanism.
Comments
Post a Comment