More About PB CAT Judgment
I understand always my
limitation on issues concerned and dealt for the last few years. One such issue
is pension revision for the BSNL absorbed retirees.
My writeups may convince or may
not convince the comrades concerned, but I never fail to go deep and give
serious thought over that. I always aim how to bring the bonds to all the
stakeholders .
I tried to maintain the spirit
of Nagara SC Judgment, that pensioners placed in similar positions are a class.
My understanding is, may not be a convincing one to many, CG pensioners retired
fully from the Govt service, getting CDA is a class of themselves , whereas we
the 4 lakh BSNL absorbed forming ourselves a class of different nature on IDA.
In order to join that CG class
for the sake of pre 2017 pensioners , we cannot leave our bonds with our post
2017, who were all in 2nd prc scales on 1-1-2017 as employees. I don't say
solution is impossible. But without breaking heads, it is not an easy or casual
one. I agree that my knowledge on that is limited one.
Healthy criticism about my views
is good to find solution. But bad and filthy language is no use to anyone.
Naming and bracketing are very old organisational methods failed in its
experiments.
So finding answer to the relevant
questions are the sure road to solving the issues cropping up because of this
latest PB CAT Judgment.
Though the Judgment is helping
to bring parity with the pre 2016 pensioners in clear terms, it created
disparity ,not in open terms, amongst the United bsnl absorbed since 1-10-2000.
I have been telling that the
demand of simultaneous settlement of pension revision with pay revision would
carryforward the existing bonding.
After oct 17 th 2022, I felt DOT
is ready to bring pension revision , ofcourse with nil fitment, in the absence
of pay revision, finding solution to post 2017 also w.e.f 1-1-2017. It seemed
to me that Spirit of DOT was good, and I thought it would help to find solution
to both pre and post 2017 on 3rd PRC scales. Some associations tried to bring
some improvement on fitment. But they could not till this date. That solution
presented by DOT maintained the parity amongst the BSNL absorbed as a single
class.
Unfortunately or fortunately to
many pre 2016 pensioners some Associations gone to PBCAT and won the case of
CPC parity fitment. This new situation brought the dislocation of post 2017
from the single class position of the BSNL absorbed as per this judgment.
This Judgment on the face of it
favours pre 2016 to tie them with CG pensioners and CPC. In central govt their
single class position was safeguarded by simultaneous implementation of both
pay revision and pension revision as per CPC.
Here in our case , our demand is
only pension revision , after knowing as somebody is telling 'wage revision is
mirage in bsnl '.
Unless pay is changed in some
form to the employees on 1-1-2017 that is post 2017 , their pension calculation
would continue only on 2nd prc scales. The question that we need to find answer
is, how to make them fit in CG parity as per CPC and as per this Judgment.
The associations and their
experienced leaders may have confidence to find an answer. I wish them every
success.
0800 hrs 27 -9 2023
R.PATTABIRAMAN
Comments
Post a Comment